Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patricia Amado's avatar

Some recognition, at long last, to the textile female Artists, and to the textile art itself. I can’t remember the name of the documentary I had watched last year that talked about Tartan. The documentary led by men, wearing the tartan skirts, and how to wear them, etc., talked about the history of it. Historically, it was women who foraged for the plants that created the natural dyes to color the wools to spinning and weaving, and creating the specific patterns that pertained to their particular clan. But just because it was done by the local housewives and female artisans for their local communities, they were not called Artists. Yet, it’s now considered an art form.

Jaime Odabachian - The Rug Man's avatar

Congratulations Veronica, this is an important article and an important conversation.

At the same time, I think contemporary criticism often risks flattening an extraordinarily deep human and civilizational phenomenon into a purely oppressor/oppressed framework. The very fact that so many of the great textile artists and weavers throughout history have been women does not diminish the seriousness of the medium. Quite the opposite. It confirms the profound and inseparable feminine nature of textile art itself.

From Anatolia to Persia to the Andes, weaving sat at the center of memory, kinship, domestic continuity, trade, symbolism, and material culture. Anni Albers (who worked even in Mexico!) understood this deeply. Textile work is one of humanity’s oldest intellectual and artistic technologies: mathematical, architectural, symbolic, and profoundly social.

Reducing this legacy solely to a post-Marxist reading of oppression risks overlooking the deeper beauty and significance of the tradition itself, and the extraordinary role women played in shaping civilization through it.

un gran abrazo!

Jaime (the Rug Man)

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?